Page 1 of 1

"We're not coming for them" Yeah, Right.

Posted: Thu May 03, 2018 1:35 pm
by Tommy Atkins
“But We're NOT coming for your guns, you are paranoid”!
.
“Ban assault weapons and buy them back. It might cost $15 billion, but we can afford it. Consider it an investment in our most important right, the right to live. Based on manufacturing figures and other indirect data, there could be 15 million assault weapons out there. If we offer $200—as many local governments have —then it would cost about $3 billion; at $1,000 each, the cost would be about $15 billion. ”:
Rep. Eric Swalwell, a Democrat from California’s San Francisco Bay area, is co-chair of the House Democratic Steering and Policy Committee, and serves on the House Judiciary Committee and the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.
.
“Australia got it right. “
.
OK, show of hands, who's got big pile of sub $200 firearms at today's prices? That's not a “Buyback” Plus they were never yours in the firs place!, Its thieving on the grand scale.
.
You can not have it both ways, so you're lying. You're either lying in he first instance, or you're lying in the second, & third ones, but you ARE absolutely without a shadow of doubt lying!

Re: "We're not coming for them" Yeah, Right.

Posted: Sun Jul 14, 2019 12:36 pm
by Dannyboy53
Yes sir Mr. Tommy I agree. I would even go so far as to say the VAST majority of politicians are liars!

Re: "We're not coming for them" Yeah, Right.

Posted: Sun Jul 14, 2019 2:46 pm
by Charles Lipscomb
Eric is out, but he was only in it for tge publicity.
Not that he wasn't serious about taking all the guns, well except for his bodyguards.
As to All the others, they want them as well.
I think pooliticans running for office and vowing to throw money away on their pet causes, gun bans climate change, solar power , etc should have to come up with the cash out of their own pockets, or that of their parties. Even 10 percent would be a hellava incentive to get spending under control.


I know you guys are thinking what about the wall?
The wall isn't taking anything away from us. Not our rights nor our guns...

Re: "We're not coming for them" Yeah, Right.

Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2019 10:55 am
by TNGhost
They are not coming for our guns.

They are coming for us.

It's not about the guns, it is about who has them.

Re: "We're not coming for them" Yeah, Right.

Posted: Tue Aug 20, 2019 8:09 am
by BCR#1
TNGhost wrote:
Mon Jul 15, 2019 10:55 am
They are not coming for our guns.

They are coming for us.

It's not about the guns, it is about who has them.
W/O our military backing them up, gun grabbing politico's don't have a chance in hell with confiscation enforcement.

Bill

Re: "We're not coming for them" Yeah, Right.

Posted: Wed Aug 21, 2019 2:13 pm
by shoggoth80
The current socio-political climate is very disturbing.

Re: "We're not coming for them" Yeah, Right.

Posted: Sun Aug 25, 2019 5:00 pm
by Charles Lipscomb
Hate giving them ideas, but if they sent unarmed girl scouts to collect our guns we would all be in deep shit.