Well, the board is either fixed, or it's going to run terribly. Cross your fingers and hope for the best. I'm at my technical limit right now.

"We're not coming for them" Yeah, Right.

Info on Second Amendment happenings that impact you!
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Tommy Atkins
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 726
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2017 4:47 pm
Age: 66
Location: Hagerstown, MD
Canada

"We're not coming for them" Yeah, Right.

#1 Post by Tommy Atkins » Thu May 03, 2018 1:35 pm

“But We're NOT coming for your guns, you are paranoid”!
.
“Ban assault weapons and buy them back. It might cost $15 billion, but we can afford it. Consider it an investment in our most important right, the right to live. Based on manufacturing figures and other indirect data, there could be 15 million assault weapons out there. If we offer $200—as many local governments have —then it would cost about $3 billion; at $1,000 each, the cost would be about $15 billion. ”:
Rep. Eric Swalwell, a Democrat from California’s San Francisco Bay area, is co-chair of the House Democratic Steering and Policy Committee, and serves on the House Judiciary Committee and the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.
.
“Australia got it right. “
.
OK, show of hands, who's got big pile of sub $200 firearms at today's prices? That's not a “Buyback” Plus they were never yours in the firs place!, Its thieving on the grand scale.
.
You can not have it both ways, so you're lying. You're either lying in he first instance, or you're lying in the second, & third ones, but you ARE absolutely without a shadow of doubt lying!

User avatar
Dannyboy53
Registered User
Registered User
Posts: 21
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2018 2:06 pm
Age: 65
Location: Bell, Florida
United States of America

Re: "We're not coming for them" Yeah, Right.

#2 Post by Dannyboy53 » Sun Jul 14, 2019 12:36 pm

Yes sir Mr. Tommy I agree. I would even go so far as to say the VAST majority of politicians are liars!
"If the general government should persist in the measures now threatened, there must be war."
General Thomas 'Stonewall' Jackson

Charles Lipscomb
Member
Member
Posts: 193
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 6:10 am
Age: 52
Location: Daytona Beach
United States of America

Re: "We're not coming for them" Yeah, Right.

#3 Post by Charles Lipscomb » Sun Jul 14, 2019 2:46 pm

Eric is out, but he was only in it for tge publicity.
Not that he wasn't serious about taking all the guns, well except for his bodyguards.
As to All the others, they want them as well.
I think pooliticans running for office and vowing to throw money away on their pet causes, gun bans climate change, solar power , etc should have to come up with the cash out of their own pockets, or that of their parties. Even 10 percent would be a hellava incentive to get spending under control.


I know you guys are thinking what about the wall?
The wall isn't taking anything away from us. Not our rights nor our guns...
" The beatings will continue until morale improves."
Management

TNGhost
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 28
Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2017 5:22 pm
Age: 58
Location: New England
United States of America

Re: "We're not coming for them" Yeah, Right.

#4 Post by TNGhost » Mon Jul 15, 2019 10:55 am

They are not coming for our guns.

They are coming for us.

It's not about the guns, it is about who has them.

Post Reply

Return to “Second Amendment Front”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests