CETME HK 91, 93 etc.
3 posts • Page 1 of 1
Yes I know , Century has a bad rap on QC , My experience has been differant ! I own three century rifles and all have been worth the money . I could have spent twice or three times the money but do not feel it would have been worth it . My C93 was built on a Malisan parts kit , all of the bolt componets have matching numbers so most likly came from the same rifle . I checked bolt gap when I recieved the rifle and found it to be in spec. . I replaced the lower recevier ( pistol grip ) with a unit ordered from AIM .The replacement grip is heaver and hase finger groves and a larger cross section than the oridgnal . i did all of the fitting on the replacement part so that if needed i could go back to the oridgenal . I felt that the Century supplied part was to light and plain . I will post picks of both configureations . schmedly , As Always , Head Up , Eyes Out And ( first Point Of Contact ) In The Grass .
I have no idea where to sourse the handguard , I would sujest looking at AIM , Sarco or brownels . I have traded with both sarco and aim and am happy with the experience from both . here are my othere two century rifles .
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest